¶ … Fidel Castro was a communist when he assumed power of Cuba in 1959 has been a debated issue over the last 40 years. His associations with Communist leaders and groups, including the Soviet Union, and his activities in both his own country and those against the United States helped government officials at the time to convince the population that Castro was a member of the Communist party. Upon examination of his life, and his time of power, however, it is clear that Castro was not a Communist in 1959. This paper will examine the life of Fidel Castro, and will show that while his associations at the time may have been Communist, Castro himself was not.
Fidel Castro was born on a sugar plantation in the Oriente province of Cuba in 1926. Coming from a family of plantation owners, Castro worked the family sugar cane fields throughout his youth. Additionally, Castro attended the Colegio Lasalie and the Colegio Dolores, both Jesuit institutions. In 1942, Castro entered the Colegio Belen, a Jesuit prep school, and obtained a law doctorate from the University of Havana in 1950 ("Castro, Fidel," online).
Castro's political career began in the election of 1952, in which he intended to run for a parliament seat. However, that same year, then President Carlos Prio Socarras was overthrown by General Fulgencio Batista. Batista cancelled the election, thus putting a halt to the inspiring Castro. When Castro attempted to protest Batista's violation of the constitution, his court case was overturned ("Castro, Fidel," online).
It was then that Castro turned to rebellion. In 1953, he attempted to attack the Moncada Barracks. The attempt was unsuccessful, and Castro was imprisoned. Upon his release in 1955, he went to Mexico, and created the 26th of July revolutionary movement. In 1956, he and his forces invaded the coast of his home province of Oriente. Castro, his brother Raul, a revolutionary named Che Guevara, and nine other rebels his in the mountains of Maestra and gathered an army that would overthrow Batista in 1959 ("Castro, Fidel," online).
It was after Castro came to power in 1959 that the issue of whether or not he was a communist became public. During the first half of 1959, Castro's relationship with the United States was fairly friendly. In April of that year, Castro came to the United States and flatly stated he was not a communist. Additionally, he voiced disagreement with the system of communism, and stated that his ideas for the future of Cuba were democracy (Smith, 41). On May 21, 1959, Castro said, "Our revolution is neither capitalist nor communist...Capitalism sacrifices the human being, communism with its totalitarian conceptions sacrifices human rights." (Binns, Gonzalez, 4).
Even more compelling is the fact that Castro was not, in 1959, a member of the Cuban Communist Party. As a matter of fact, the 26th of July movement was completely against communism. Those members noted with contempt that the communist party of Cuba did not even help with the revolution that overthrew the existing government of Cuba, stating, "we fought the Revolution while the Communists hid safely under their beds." (Smith, 43).
Generally speaking, it was not until ties with the United States began to deteriorate, with the U.S. reaction to the revolution, a severance of formal ties with almost all nations non-communist, and Castro's desire to liberate Latin America that led to his turn to communism (Welsh, 15). This liberation was in tune with ideas of the Soviet Union, who also assisted in funding Cuba, which the United States would not do.
In June of 1959, Castro attempted to put reforms into Cuban law. Those reforms included the nationalization of foreign refineries and the potential expropriation of U.S. controlled business, such as Chase Bank, United Fruit Company, and Texaco Oil. Additionally, the plan involved the seizure and expropriation of over 1,000 acres of farmland, and the outlawing of foreign land ownership in Cuba (Gruss, E16). These lands would then be given to the peasants that had worked those lands. Hundreds of thousands of peasants were scheduled to receive land from the land reform, and the National Institute of Agrarian Reform (INRA) was formed to do so (Taber, 26).
This redistribution of land was not communist, or even socialist in nature. Only the largest estates were affected. The largest farms were broke apart, and redistributed to the peasant workforce only to solve the issue of the indebtedness of the peasant. In the end, only 25% of cultivatable land was covered by the reform. The result was an increase in...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now